On Mar 18, 2014, at 4:00 PM, Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> wrote:
> > My sense is that regardless, there is not much enthusias for > negotiating a single digest based on what digests the server offers, > with the client choosing its most preferred one. > > Is this an accurate summary of the group's consensus view? Does > anyone want to defend the view of TLSA digests as a menu of options > from which the client can choose one? > Don't know about the rest of the WG, but it's mine. Some communities have a larger local policy that they want to enforce, and the client will prefer that primarily, with potential fallbacks. > If not, I will drop the digest agility portion of the SMTP draft. > In the OPs draft we can encourage server operators (SHOULD) to > apply all digests equally to all objects, because that's more robust > in the face of local policy, and results when this is not done may > not be what the operator wanted. > Still need to see the final text, but looks like it is the right direction. Scott > Anyone else? > > -- > Viktor. > > _______________________________________________ > dane mailing list > [email protected] > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
