On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 06:16:01AM -0400, Warren Kumari wrote: > This document was written in response to a request, and so we are > compressing the more traditional 2 week call for adoption to instead > be a single week. > > Please let us know clearly if you *object* to this document being > adopted, with a clear explanation of why.
I'd expect the next thing for the IETF is to introduce an objection fee ... > This call for adoption ends Monday 07-Jul-2014. ? I've read the draft but not any preceding discussion. Publishing (not "authenticating", please) raw keys in the DNS makes a lot of sense IMHO, but it's not obvious to me why the TLSA RR type is the right one. The document does not explain why the expansion of the usage "3" is backwards compatible, i.e., not confusing old clients. -Peter _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
