On Fri, 7 Nov 2014, Stephane Bortzmeyer wrote:

The first one is that some people distrust the domain name industry
and feel that it is not safe to exchange the CA for the domain name
actors (some of them having bad reputations like G... D...). Now, we
all know it is more complicated than that (usages PKIX-* do not
required that you drop the CA system, but on the other hand, some
people fear that, if DANE is in the browser, the registrar, registry
or the DNS hoster may be able to divert your users to a false site,
something they could not do before). I don't say that I follow this
reasoning but I've heard it several times so it could be documented.

And for that, we bring you CT for DNSSEC. Go look at the presentation
and be ready to give us feedback this monday at TRANS :)

http://www.ietf.org/proceedings/91/slides/slides-91-trans-3.pdf

Paul

_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane

Reply via email to