On Wed, 25 Feb 2015, Viktor Dukhovni wrote:
Once the client is making two queries, why accept collisions? Are
we (after all these years) finally defining RFC-822/2822/5322 local
parts to be case-insensitive? (Price of progress and all that?)
Is a CNAME per-user really a major burden?
It's not one CNAME, it is many CNAMEs. You'll be hashing paul, Paul
paul.wouters, Paul.Wouters, etc. I'd be better of with a wilcard :P
The client needs smart logic anyway, and the client at least has a user
it can interact with. It can ask "A key for [email protected] does not
exist but there is a key for [email protected]".
Needing to roll out between 2 and 4 different capitalizations for
different [Ff]irstname.[Ll]astname makes everything more errorprone
and the client still needs its logic and user interaction.
Paul
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
