On Mar 15, 2015, at 5:57 PM, John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
>> Fuzzy matching on "mailboxes" bites in several places, far beyond email.  
>> While way out of scope of everything being discussed here, I think the idea 
>> of having a cut point handoff from the domain certification, to the 'user' 
>> certification, is something we can't ignore.
> 
> Right.  As I said before, it's a big can of worms.  If we think it needs to 
> be addressed at all, we need to pull it out of the current drafts (such as 
> section 3 of the openpgp draft) and deal with it directly.
> 
>> Sendmail's plus-addressing scheme is a deployed example of that sort of 
>> usage.
> 
> There's a huge list of them, case folding, ignoring some dots, ignoring all 
> dots, various sorts of LDAP things to match john.smith, johnsmith, jsmith, 
> and j.smith, often data dependent so jsmith only works if it only matches on 
> e address.

Historically, "the draft pretends the problem doesn't exist" causes ugly late 
surprises in the IESG, and then (often?) more convoluted RFCs. Having said 
that, John has a good point that the current wording sounds like it says "here 
are a few problems, and here is a potential solution".

Section 3.1 would be better worded as:

3.1.  Email address variants

Some email service providers and email software perform automatic mappings of 
the LHS of email addresses based on special characters.  This makes finding 
OPENPGPKEY record for a particular name that might be mapped impossible because 
there is no complete set of mappings and, worse, some common mappings conflict 
with each other.

It might be tempting for software that implements DNS lookup for the OPENPGPKEY 
RRtype to try to perform similar mappings while trying to find a particular 
OPENPGPKEY record. This SHOULD NOT be done because some mapping attempts might 
retrieve the key for the wrong user, depending on the mapping rules of the 
service provider or software platform.

--Paul Hoffman
_______________________________________________
dane mailing list
[email protected]
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane

Reply via email to