I do not support inclusion of this work item in this WG. The DANE-ish aspects of this work are much simpler than the IPsec ones.
I will support inclusion of this work in an IPsec-specific WG (IPsecme, or perhaps HIP) when a new version of the individual submission I-D is submitted that addresses the substantive comments I just posted. Even then, review from this WG would be a good idea. Nico -- _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
