Hiya, I have just one question I'd like to ask before starting IETF LC.
Appendix B: I'm not sure there's really going to be IETF consensus that it's better to have a TLS server cert for the hostname and not the service name. If you can point at where it's recorded that the WG reached that consensus that may save us time later. But we'll see I guess - I think there's a reasonable case for both sides of that argument. While this comment is about an appendix I suspect that if the wg change it's mind here, it'd also change other bits of the draft. Note that as soon as I get a reasonable answer I'll move on here - though I think having an easily accessible recent answer may be quite useful. Thanks, Stephen. PS: some more nits below, feel free to treat these as IETF LC comments. nits: - intro: 2nd bullet: I think including an explicit definition of "target domain" in section 2 would be good even if it's defined elsewhere too. - intro: last bullet: I don't get that sorry. - section 7: The first sentence doesn't fill one with confidence. It reads as if speculation. Maybe s/often would like/ought/ would help. _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
