>This is a strong statement, I have a problem with your word "preventing" . >My reading of the draft is that mail sender can perform the Hash() operation >on any name she/he has/guesses for the receiver, and looks each one up in >until a >match is found or the sender gives up.
>Right now we do not really know if this will scale, ... But we do know that it is absolutely forbidden by any normal reading of the mail RFCs. I am baffled that a design that is supposed to be about security would include guessing addresses that might or might not be the party to which you want to send your highly secure mail, and that the WG has repeatedly rejected small changes that could solve that problem. R's, John _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
