I've updated draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey.
This version extends the description of the openpgp format used in the RDATA section with contributions from dkg, which should address Petr's concerns. It resolves the comments from Stephen Farrell's AD review to remove some text from the introduction. It adds a note about caching negative responses to avoid privacy leaks. It also removes the text that said to lowercase the LHS, as instructed by the chairs. No replacement text has been added to explain to implementors how to deal with this very common case issue. I strongly believe this issue should be addressed by the working group resulting in text for the document that advises to implementors (be it to add multiple OPENPGPKEY records, or to allow the client to do multiple lookups) Paul -------- Forwarded Message -------- From: [email protected] To: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Subject: New Version Notification - draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-04.txt Date: Thu, 27 Aug 2015 13:32:27 -0700 A new version (-04) has been submitted for draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey: https://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-04.txt The IETF datatracker page for this Internet-Draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey/ Diff from previous version: https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-dane-openpgpkey-04 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. IETF Secretariat. _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
