> On Jan 20, 2016, at 12:49 PM, Melinda Shore <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 1/20/16 6:21 AM, Olafur Gudmundsson wrote: >> We have no plans to meet as we are trying to shut the WG down. > > I am not at all a fan of extending working groups beyond their > natural lives (and in a few cases extending them to their > natural lives) but this surprises me quite a bit, as there's > quite a bit of useful work in the queue, particularly around > end user credential for various applications. If dane isn't > going to stick around I think there's a fairly compelling case > for a maintenance and extension working group. I think many > of these documents (and I can't believe I'm about to say this) > are more appropriate as working group products rather than > as individual contributions. > > Melinda >
Melinda, I hear you but the question is do we need a general DANE group for that or if a new more focused group(s) take over ? The issue as Warren and I see is that the “energy” of the group has decreased a lot indicating to us there is limited interest in the work. We are happy to see more energy in the group and to take on new work. Everyone, The chairs and AD want to see discussion on the future of the working group. Please bring to the table what you see the group can/should do. It is up to the participants to set the direction for the group. If the group continues we will recharter to reflect the direction. To facilitate f2f discussion on this topic, the chairs have requested a 1 hour slot in BA, BUT PLEASE start the conversation here. Olafur & Warren _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
