Hi again, really -- does re-chartering have a higher bar now? I would have thought, if some items are already in/alluded to in the existing charter, then extending it for focussed extensions that are close-coupled to the current text could be a quicker approach. That's certainly been my experience in the past.
Either way, a new charter (or extension to the current one) requires enthusiasts to spell out exactly what the tasks will be, when they are needed/aim to be completed, and get people willing to do the work. That means charter text. Your esteemed co-chair did ask for this, so over to you folks -- if you want it, make it happen. (I'm sure there's an apposite Mel Brooks quote here). all the best, Lawrence On 5 Feb 2016, at 01:53, John R Levine <[email protected]> wrote: >> Thanks for the suggestion! I'd prefer to try to recharter the current group >> with any new work items first, before this more drastic option. But glancing >> at the current charter just now, it might already cover some of the work >> that I outlined earlier. > > If you have a clear, well focused list of things to do, you'll probably find > that setting up a new WG is easier than rechartering. It certainly comes > with less baggage. > > Regards, > John Levine, [email protected], Taughannock Networks, Trumansburg NY > Please consider the environment before reading this e-mail. _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
