>the IPR declaration's statement that licensing information >will be provided "later."
I agree with Paul that it's a lousy application, and I think that more likely than not it'll be abandoned with no patents granted. But if any of the three applications (US, EU, China) turned into actual patents, and Verisign were to require a license that cost money, or that was otherwise incompatible with open source implementations, that would be a problem. I see that Verisign has offered a free-unless-you-sue-us license for other patent applications, like this one, dunno why they do for some but not others: https://datatracker.ietf.org/ipr/2703/ In any event, you alrady know what my suggested solution is. R's, John _______________________________________________ dane mailing list [email protected] https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/dane
