Like Victor says Reject as this is a spam errata filing > On Jun 7, 2024, at 10:45 PM, Viktor Dukhovni <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 07, 2024 at 02:08:19PM -0700, RFC Errata System wrote: > >> The following errata report has been submitted for RFC6698, >> "The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Transport Layer >> Security (TLS) Protocol: TLSA". >> >> -------------------------------------- >> You may review the report below and at: >> https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid7975 >> >> -------------------------------------- >> Type: Technical >> Reported by: PJI <[email protected]> >> >> Section: GLOBAL >> >> Original Text >> ------------- >> unlicense >> >> Corrected Text >> -------------- >> unlicense >> >> Notes >> ----- >> 2119 > > Neither "unlicense" (USA spelling), nor "unlicence" (much of of the rest > of the English speaking world) appear in the document, and the erratum, > as proposed, is a NOOP. The word "License" (US), appears only in the > RFC2119 boilerplate text. If the intent is to switch to non-USA > spelling (works for me, but good luck with that!), I don't believe that > doing that document by document as a "technical" erratum is a productive > path forward. > > The erratum should be rejected. > > -- > Viktor.
_______________________________________________ dane mailing list -- [email protected] To unsubscribe send an email to [email protected]
