>> > How is the way your C code works better than first linking src to tmp
>> > and then, assuming that succeeds, doing the various necessary checks and
>> > either renaming it to dst or deleting it depending on the outcome?
>> Link is synchronous on traditional Unix filesystems and on NFS.
> I don't see how that's an argument one way or the other, given both rely
> on it?
Speed. With your approach, we'd be (synchronously) linking every
single patch just to have a look.
Could we please come back to the actual issue, namely the numbered
points in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> ?
Juliusz
_______________________________________________
darcs-devel mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
