Thomas Counsell wrote:
Hello
On 21 Aug 2006, at 05:33, Eric Y. Kow wrote:
Should we maybe tone down the "Smart" bit?
Maybe something like "Flexible"
"Flexible" when applied to software can mean "needs lots of configuration"
or "Simple"... Isn't that what we're
trying to get at?
"Simple" can mean "Has little functionality...intentionally!"
Perhaps spontaneous? That is the key word used in the paragraph, and
certainly one of the aspects of darcs that I enjoy most.
"Spontaneous Branches" evokes "branches that spring into existence on
their own". But just "Spontaneous" on its own sounds almost like
"unpredictable".
I think a lot good words have been tainted by their prior use in
marketing. Sometimes I see the word "Intelligent" to describe software,
but I prefer the more casual "Smart".
I didn't see the old "Hi..." phrasing as pretentious, I found it more
personal and friendly.
I think it's going to be hard to please everyone with the marketing. If
we are too introverted about it, we undersell ourselves and miss out on
users.
<tangent>
I was surprised about some of the pro-subversion things I found on the
wiki over the weekend on the darcs-vs-subversion page. (I've changed
them now.) It wasn't that they were malicious or false, it was just that
the same thing could be expressed as a positive for darcs instead of a
positive for subversion.
For example, "Subversion is more similar to CVS". I think from the darcs
perspective, this is actually an /advantage/ for darcs, but it was
portrayed the other way around. It's a fine opinion to prefer to
Subversion and see that is an advantage, but on our wiki, it's certainly
fair to present things from a perspective that promotes darcs!
</tangent>
On the other hand, if we too over-confident and pushy about our image,
it can appear to be false or at least unappealing.
What I felt was missing from the front page was really getting a sense
of darcs at a glance. I thought "Distributed. Interactive. Smart."
helped with that.
If you read further, we do back up this marketing with detail about all
of these, including eventual links to papers and talks about the patch
algebra, which look very "smart" to me, and it's not something I see
happening with the other SCMs, so it seemed fair to me.
Mark
_______________________________________________
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://www.abridgegame.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
