Hi Ian! >> - Darcs is not complete (some patches fail to commute); >> - Darcs is not correct (will sometimes write an incorrect repo); >> - Darcs is subject to combinatorial explosion; >> - Darcs is coded inefficiently in some areas.
> (Your numbers don't match the length of your list) Maths is difficult ;-) (Three serious and one trivial, as you rightly note.) > I think improving darcs incrementally is just as easy, I'm not so sure, at least for psychological reasons. > The first issues you list are all part of the same thing: We need to > replace mergers with something else, and as far as I know we're still > looking for an algorithm, Yep. > Who'll be able to be in the Freiburg area between > http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~keller/haskellws/HaskellWorkshop.html > and http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Hac_2007_II ? Pity, no. Juliusz _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list darcs-devel@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
