On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 12:38:51AM +0200, Tommy Pettersson wrote: > I looked at some of these: > > > Thu Jun 28 16:23:28 MST 2007 Kevin Quick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Remove explicit DarcsFlags args; use Repository options (adds > > repoFlags). > > Didn't look at this one. > > > Tue Jul 17 22:54:26 MST 2007 Kevin Quick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Fix issue329: typing q for record --ask-deps records anyway with no > > deps. > > > > Wed Jul 18 00:33:50 MST 2007 Kevin Quick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Fix issue308: no empty patch created for a record with no selected > > patches or dependencies. > > These two looks good. I want to pull them to darcs-unstable if > the UI change can be agreed on.
I must be getting tiered. My "can be agreed on" was a bit exaggerated, wasn't it?. I can see this UI change was brought up on the user list, and no one has objected (yet) -- not that I expect anyone will, because I think it would be hard to argue against this change. Yes, I am getting tiered. I forgot to make one more note. My experience with darcs says it's better to record the test and the fix in separate patches; it sometimes happens you want just one of them, and it also avoids unnecessary dependencies. -- Tommy Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list darcs-devel@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
