On Mon, Jul 30, 2007 at 08:15:25PM +0200, Eric Kow wrote: > I'm not particularly keen on the second part of this patch. It was suggested > on #darcs, and I thought I'd float it for argument. Could go either way. > > Pro: > - reduces the number of commands (user's don't know the diff) > Con: > - we lose the 'pull' and 'unpull' symmetry > > Sat Jul 28 11:50:57 CEST 2007 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Slightly refactor unpull (make it an alias). > > Mon Jul 30 20:11:38 CEST 2007 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Hide darcs unpull command.
There is an old idea to make Unpull safe (in contrast to Obliterate). Unpull would require one or more source repos as arguments, and refuse to ditch any patches that are not available in one of the source repos. This way you're safe from losing a patch completely. And it would be even more symetric to Pull this way. -- Tommy Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list darcs-devel@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
