On Fri, Aug 03, 2007 at 08:45:06PM +0200, Eric Y. Kow wrote: > :-( ! > > That's odd. I tried to reproduce it with my build of stable, but > didn't manage to do so.
You should see it if you run optimize --reorder twice (or maybe three times). This causes an alternation between different states. > > darcs get darcs-unstable foo > > cd foo > > darcs optimize --reorder > > darcs whatsnew > > Maybe a binary search through the patches (unpull half and see > what happens?). I'd suggest trackdown, but it seems like that > would take forever to do if we're using unstable to reproduce > this... unless you can figure out a minimal test for it. I think this should be relatively easy (for me) and I'll try to tackle it Monday, if I can (no internet connection at home just now). I also see that tentative_pristine really ought to have flatten_to_primitives called on the patches that go into it... -- David Roundy Department of Physics Oregon State University
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list darcs-devel@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
