Just adding some history here. > We do not further document what "debu g" does, and it has a confusingly > similar name to me. > > I would argue that "darcs -vv" or greater should automatically invoke > "--debug".
I had submitted a set of patches, some of which set up the -v -v infrastructure, and others which use it to display more information. One of the patches needed some work -- potential memory leak -- which I never got to. So I suspect that only the infrastructure patches made it in and not the actual verbosity. On the other hand, I notice that David has added some extra verbosity. He has also simplified the -v -v approach to a single --debug flag, as Mark points out... which probably makes sense from a keep-it-simple perspective. -- Eric Kow http://www.loria.fr/~kow PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9 Merci de corriger mon français. _______________________________________________ darcs-devel mailing list darcs-devel@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel
