Excerpts from David Roundy's message of Thu Jan 17 16:36:16 +0100 2008:
> On Thu, Jan 17, 2008 at 12:56:42PM +0000, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
> > Thu Jan 17 13:53:40 CET 2008  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >   * Move rollback to another section of TheCommands.
> 
> Content-Description: A darcs patch for your repository!
> > 
> > New patches:
> > 
> > [Move rollback to another section of TheCommands.
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] {
> > hunk ./src/Darcs/TheCommands.lhs 71
> >                  Group_name "Direct modification of the repository:",
> >                  Command_data tag,
> >                  Command_data setpref,
> > -                Command_data rollback,
> >                  Group_name "Querying the repository:",
> >                  Command_data diff_command,
> >                  Command_data changes,
> > hunk ./src/Darcs/TheCommands.lhs 81
> >                  Group_name "Copying patches between repositories with 
> > working copy update:",
> >                  Command_data pull,
> >                  Command_data obliterate, Hidden_command unpull,
> > +                Command_data rollback,
> >                  Command_data push,
> >                  Command_data send,
> >                  Command_data apply,
> 
> This doesn't seem quite right, as rollback doesn't copy patches between
> repositories.  But then, neither does obliterate.  :(  I'm not sure how to
> best improve the organization here.

It seems that obliterate, unpull and rollback deserve their own section :)

-- 
Nicolas Pouillard aka Ertai
_______________________________________________
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel

Reply via email to