Wagner Ferenc wrote:
> "Nicolas Pouillard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> Excerpts from Nicolas Pouillard's message of Wed Jan 16 11:23:52 +0100
>> 2008:
>>> Excerpts from Tommy Pettersson's message of Wed Jan 16 11:22:00 +0100
>>> 2008:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 02:52:45AM +0000, Nicolas Pouillard wrote:
>>>>> Wed Jan 16 03:47:06 CET 2008  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>>   * Add --dont-allow-conflicts to darcs pull.
>>>>>   
>>>>>   It also adds --allow-conflicts that is the default behavior of pull.
>>>> 
>>>> I only looked at this patch quickly, but it looks like it
>>>> differs from the conflict options to the Apply command in a
>>>> surprise-prone way. I think the options should be:
>>>> 
>>>>   --mark-conflicts    (default behavior for Pull)
>>>>   --allow-conflicts    (...but don't mark them)
>>>>   --dont-allow-conflicts    (default behavior for Append)
>>> 
>>> You're right, I will resubmit a patch then.
>>
>> I've just sent another patch (that amend this one).
> 
> Speaking of this, wouldn't it be reasonable to make pull default to
> --dont-allow-conflicts if there are unrecorded changes in the repo?

Yes, please!!!

Cheers
Ben

_______________________________________________
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel

Reply via email to