On Jan 23, 2008, at 9:46 AM, David Roundy wrote:

> Two cases I'd like to see is darcs 2 pre with hashed-format on each  
> side,
> and darcs 2 pre with old-format on each side.

Here are the times for replicating an entire repository of http:// 
allmydata.org including all of its history:

*  darcs2pre with hashed format on each side:

14m19s, 12m38s, 11m27s

*  darcs2pre with old format on each side:

16m14s, 20m7s, 17m9s

*  darcs2pre with darcs-2-format on each side:

26m45s, 11m23s, 14m28s

Note that there was no progress-indication for any of these.


*  "hg clone --pull" with the complete history of the repository in  
hg format (thanks to tailor)

2m44s, 2m30s

*  "rsync -r" of a darcs-2 format repository

2m25s, 2m25s

*  rsync of a very tightly compressed (7z) tarball containing all of  
the information of the darcs-2-format repository:

1m9s, 1m12s


One practical consequence of these measurements is that I will  
strongly encourage my current users to use "rsync -r" instead of  
"darcs get".

Regards,

Zooko

_______________________________________________
darcs-devel mailing list
darcs-devel@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-devel

Reply via email to