Hi Daan, various (most) questions have been answered in threads started just after the BK problem came out; please refer to the archives (see URL at bottom) for answers and come back for things you failed to find there.
On Monday 09 May 2005 18:59, Daan Leijen wrote: > As some of you might know Linus is developing his > own "patch-management system" called "git" to manage > the Linux development tree. I personally can hardly > believe that the Linux community is developing a > new tool from sratch instead of using one of the > existing SCM's like Darcs :-( > > The touted reason is performance: the Linux kernel > tree is huge. However, it would in my opinion be much > more worthwile to optimize an existing system instead > of hacking some new thing together. > > This brings me to my question: How is the situation > regarding the performance of Darcs? I heard David (?) > is trying to improve performance of Darcs on large > repositories. Can someone enlighten me where Darcs > lacks performance for the Linux repository? Will Darcs > ever be fast enough? (and in what timeframe?) > > This would be an excellent time to start managing the > Linux tree with Darcs -- it seems the ultimate opportunity > for Darcs to become the next big thing :-) > > All the best, > -- Daan Leijen. > > > > _______________________________________________ > darcs-users mailing list > darcs-users@darcs.net > http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users -- Thomas Zander
pgp8onClKtsdw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
