On Wed, 1 Jun 2005, John Goerzen wrote:
On Wed, Jun 01, 2005 at 07:23:12PM +0200, Erik B�gfors wrote:
On 6/1/05, John Goerzen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Incidentally, this bazaar-ng tutorial seems strikingly similar to darcs
in some areas, right down to bzr send...
http://www.bazaar-ng.org/tutorial.html
Of course, the whole idea of bazaar-ng is to take the best features
from darcs, arch, svn, etc and make something even better. Darcs has
some really great things when it comes to easy to use and
collaboration over emails etc. Stupid not to use those ideas.
Right. But the reason I'm posting here is to get a feel for where darcs
is headed down the road.
Let's say that bazaar-ng is successful and implements all that is good
about darcs.
Please also think about where will be darcs in this time when bazaar-ng
impoements current functionality. It seems darcs development is quite
alive...
That would mean there is really no need for darcs any
longer.
I'm afraid you're talking about ideal world and ideal SCM, which will
probably never happen. Why do you think we have all those O/S OSes around?
I think for the same reason we will have quite a load of SCMs in the
future with very slow "consolidation".
Cheers,
Karel
--
Karel Gardas [EMAIL PROTECTED]
ObjectSecurity Ltd. http://www.objectsecurity.com
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
