On Sun, Jan 15, 2006 at 11:44:02AM -0800, Jason Dagit wrote: > On Jan 15, 2006, at 2:48 AM, Tommy Pettersson wrote: > >I started a trackdown before I went to bed yesterday, and am > >now seeing: > > > > Trying without the patch: > > Mon May 9 22:39:55 CEST 2005 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * Eliminate slurp_write_dirty from Unrecord > > Finished recording patch 'init' > > Finished recording patch 'foo' > > > > Sun Jan 15 10:10:31 CET 2006 Tommy Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > * foo > > Shall I unpull this patch? (1/?) [ynWvpxqadjkc], or ? for help: > > Finished unpulling. > > Success! > > That's different than what I get: > Trying without the patch: > Sun Jan 2 07:43:49 PST 2005 David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * add Conflictor patch type. > > That was the last patch that mine unpulled, but it also skipped > several patches before that due to compilation problems. I wonder if > the bug we're trying to find is causing us problems. I ran the > unpull between 1.0.3 and 1.0.4.
Well, the point where trackdown succeeds is just a working starting point from which one can compare or try to pull various patches until the error appears. Conflicts that prevents a clean build can possibly cause lots of "unnecessary" unpulls. The trackdown command has no smartness in it yet. I've been pulling quite many patches from "my" starting point without hitting the bug so far. Maybe this approach turns out not to be the best for finding this bug. -- Tommy Pettersson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
