[snipsnip] > I'd like to know what you think of this idea. I'm not totally against these ideas, but I do wonder what the purpose is. I understand the purpose when there is a large project, with many developers, so that they can plan. But darcs is a smaller project. Most of the submissions are handled by Tommy or Juliusz, not a large tree of maintainers. And darcs is still in experimental development where developers are 'playing around' in a sense to see what works.
I'm definitely not trying to say that there is no value in having a more strict release schedule, but I myself do not see a big need. Perhaps you could explain why it would be helpful? In more specific terms than just saying we could plan around releases. -- Zachary P. Landau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://www.abridgegame.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
