On Tue, 29 Apr 2008 16:57:52 +0100
Ashley Moran <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 29 Apr 2008, at 16:36, zooko wrote:
> > I think the point of the darcs-2-format is new improved patch
> > semantics:
>
> Ok, since I have no need to preserve darcs-1 compatability and the
> new format is as fast as the hashed one, I'll continue to use darcs-2
> repos.
AFAICT, speaking of "darcs-2-format" is misleading: the latest major
version of darcs introduces two new tecnologies, a new format
("hashed") which brings several benefits (faster, obfuscated pristine,
centralized cacheability, ...) and a new semantic ("darcs-2"). The
latter is (currently) built on top of the new hashed format.
While darcs 2.0 is able to exchange patches between repositories with
a different format, the same can't happen if the repositories have
different semantics: as explained here and there, changing semantic
alters *how* darcs operates on the patches, for example how it detects
conflicts between them.
hth,
ciao, lele.
--
nickname: Lele Gaifax | Quando vivrò di quello che ho pensato ieri
real: Emanuele Gaifas | comincerò ad aver paura di chi mi copia.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | -- Fortunato Depero, 1929.
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
darcs-users@darcs.net
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
