On 2008.04.30 07:03:45 -0700, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> scribbled 1.2K 
characters:
> On Tue, Apr 29, 2008 at 11:34:35PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Tue Apr 29 23:19:21 EDT 2008  [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >   * darcs prefs: remove type witness stuff, breaks compiles
> >   It's worth noting that the test as it stood ran on every patch record, 
> > and allows patches to be recorded only if one can compile with type 
> > witnesses.
> >   It's also worth noting that 6.8.x can't compile everything with type 
> > witnesses, and lispy says 6.6.1 can't either. So, in general, turning on 
> > type witnesses in this particular place strikes me as a very very bad thing 
> > to do.
> >   If Dr. Roundy wants to automatically test compilation with type 
> > witnesses, the thing to do is to have the configure script turn it on if an 
> > example compiles, say. Forcing it on just leads to breakage and 
> > considerable annoyance for people who have to rm _darcs/prefs/prefs just to 
> > record some patches.
>
> No, the default should be to run all tests.  If you don't have ghc 6.6 on
> your machine, you can trivially configure your repository to run a subset
> of the full test suite.  This is a per-repository configurable option,
> after all.
> --
> David Roundy

I still don't follow.

I don't see how forcing compilation with known broken stuff is a 'test'.

I don't see how the current record hook can be said to 'run all tests' when it 
doesn't even do something like 'make test_network' (or whatever other tests are 
omitted as well).

And I don't see why being a 'per-repository configurable option' is any sort of 
justification or defense; by that logic, everything in the configure script is 
per-repository configurable, and we might as well default to type witnesses, 
remove the capability tests, hardwire in package names, etc...

--
gwern
355 1071 Audiotel Tzanhanim of WA2000 top security mixm enigma

Attachment: pgp76vMPImc90.pgp
Description: PGP signature

_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to