On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 8:22 AM, Dmitry Kurochkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 11:11 PM, David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> On Thu, Sep 18, 2008 at 06:04:04PM +0400, Dmitry Kurochkin wrote: >>> Amended version of the patch. Now there is no conflict in pull and >>> wibble case added. >> >> Actually, it turns out that this test fails (at least sometimes) on an >> nfs file system with a locked-file error: >> >> Running issue27.sh ... FAILED! >> Output from failed issue27.sh: >> >> rm -rf temp1 temp2 >> mkdir temp1 >> cd temp1 >> darcs init >> echo first > a >> darcs add a >> darcs record --pipe --all --patch-name=first <<EOF >> What is the date? Who is the author? What is the log? >> Finished recording patch 'first' >> >> echo first > b >> darcs add b >> darcs record --pipe --all --patch-name=first <<EOF >> What is the date? Who is the author? What is the log? >> Finished recording patch 'first' >> >> darcs get . ../temp2 >> darcs: >> ./_darcs/patches/20080918223706-f64cd-343d3ba892f2dc113953a5ef6e792eda07ae1b04.gz: >> copyFile: resource busy (file is locked) >> >> This is an odd error, and may just be a server problem, so I'll try >> pushing again. If it fails again, then this is a new issue... > > David, did you try to push this again? Is the error still there?
Yes, the issue27.sh test still fails for me. I assume it's either nfs that makes the difference, or ghc 6.6. David _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list darcs-users@darcs.net http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
