Thanks for writing this patch! Ben Franksen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> Sun Oct 12 01:41:48 CEST 2008 [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> * cleanup default boring
Is "refactor" a more precise description than "cleanup"? > [...] it is questionable whether we want to ignore libraries and > binaries by default, see these lines > > # objects and libraries; lo and la are libtool things > \\.(obj|a|exe|so|lo|la)$ What is the use case for darcs recording such files? The only cases I can think of (providing convenience copies to users) would IMO be served better by a predist hook when creating release tarballs. > [I had a wrong defaults file, so 'darcs send' didn't ask me to edit > the description. Therefore the follow-up.] That happens to me from time to time, too -- when I do "HOME=$PWD darcs" to disable my .darcs while testing bugs. I think darcs send should default to asking "edit message body?" the same way that darcs record does, and then allow users to put either "send no-edit" or "send edit" in their .darcs/defaults. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
