On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 07:06:29 -0400, David Roundy wrote: > Oh my, I certainly hadn't gathered that you were considering getting rid > of make_changelog!
Yeah: the longwindedness was just me trying to say (1) ok let's get rid of make_changelog in darcs.net (2) but I still want to use something like it So I think would like to see a changelog-helper tool as related software, part of the darcs ecosystem. The idea is that I would just use changelog-helper on the side and periodically send patches updating the text file. > That makes sense. Having a simple ChangeLog is... simpler. If you're > serious about this, I'm fine with it as well. But I'll wait for another > email before applying this, just since it *is* such a major change in the > build process... (and you're the one who's been doing the changelog > entries). Maybe wait till tomorrow in case I have any last regrets :-) Otherwise, let's keep it simple -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
