On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 09:45:44AM +0000, Eric Kow wrote: > Hi David, > > In case it's not too late, the second patch is amended with better > version numbers.
No, it's not too late. I've been having some trouble revamping my test system (which involves running the tests on two of my computers). Applied, and thanks! David > Duncan has kindly educated me on the best way to write these dependencies. In > particular, he has shown me the package versioning policy, which is followed > by > core libraries and hopefully more libraries in the future. > > http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Package_versioning_policy > > For the curious, basically >= A.B.C && < A.(B+1) should do what we expect. > It means, "I want all the features in version A.B.C, and can live with > API changes as long as they are backward-compatible" > > If it's too late already, I will be happy to just send a new patch > > Thanks! > > Tue Oct 21 14:17:11 BST 2008 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Simplify author field in darcs.cabal.in. > I think the et al. confuses my mail client. > > Wed Oct 22 10:40:15 BST 2008 Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > * Simplify darcs.cabal.in and add more precise dependencies. > This removes any information from the cabal file which is redundant > with franchise, reduces the number of choices you can make (haskeline > and terminfo now mandatory) and adds more precise package dependency > information. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
