On Wed, Oct 22, 2008 at 12:59 AM, Jason Dagit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 21, 2008 at 9:27 PM, Trent W. Buck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> I like your points, here are just a few comments I had.
>
>> Literate Haskell means the user manual source has to be TeX. A
>> separate tree would allow us to evaluate alternative source formats,
>> such as texinfo, docbook or restructured text (reST).
>
> I don't think this is strictly true unless the alternative format
> doesn't allow \begin{code} ... \end{code} or lines beginning with the
> greater than symbol.
To be more accurate, it's strictly false. Since we remove all the
code blocks before processing the documentation, it could be done in
any language.
David
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
