On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 3:15 PM, Eric Kow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 12:38:06 -0700, Simon Michael wrote: >> > it would reduce the danger of me applying the wrong patch if you reply to >> > the ones you amend with a reply-to-all >> >> Thanks David, I'll try to follow that.. > > This is one of the those cases where we need to improve our automation > ratio. Some way of helping us keep track of patch amendments would be > nice, perhaps a patch tracker in the way Jason was suggesting. > > I realise that everybody is on-board on this one and doesn't need > convincing, but I just thought it would be useful to point out again > a concrete case of something that could be fixed by infrastructure... > all in due time :-D
I think we have the infrastructure already if we just started using it. CC'ing the bug tracker with patches would get us most of the way there. I seem to recall someone objecting to this recently when someone actually did it though. I can't recall the details off the top of my head. Jason _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
