Hi Reinier, "Reinier Lamers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> 2008/10/28 David Roundy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> Note that a very nice improvment for this would be to introduce a >> mechanism for obtaining the changes to just a subset of files, >> i.e. issue814. > > At the hacking sprint I implemented a version of get_unrecorded that > only checks for changes under specified paths. When that has been sent > to David I'll send a patch on top of that to use that whenever we use > get_unrecorded and also know that we're actually only looking for > changes in a subset of the repository. Please watch out that we don't > do overlapping work... good to hear, I'll wait for your submission then. I just stumbled upon this when I did some timing tests and get_unrecorded took much longer than reading the relevant patches and showing the changes. Benedikt _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
