On Thu, Oct 30, 2008 at 21:39:47 +0000, Ganesh Sittampalam wrote: > It turns out you're exactly right about this; it is a significant > slowdown, presumably because of hash collisions.
Would increasing the number of characters hashed, say to 60, sufficiently reduce the risk of hash collisions, while still achieving the intended effect of this patch? -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
pgpvWwBFmzs9G.pgp
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
