On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 01:00:08PM +0000, Eric Kow wrote: > Also, if there are any changes to be made, I think we should make them > *on top* of this bundle because amend-recording is simply not going to > be practical (I don't meant to belabour the point, it's just that > amending is a bit ingrained in our culture, so people get a bit nervous > when there is a large amount of work that wants to get in)
I'm pushing this patch set now, in spite of its low quality. If it weren't for the fact that much of the sprint work depends on it, I would *not* be pushing it. Beginning an unimportant (i.e. constant prefactor) performace patch with a performance regression and never testing performance is absolutely the worst way to proceed. Performance patches are *always* low priority, and should therefore should only be made when they are both certain to be correct and have been tested to actually improve performace. This patch set violates both principles. David
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
