On Mon, Dec 08, 2008 at 13:37:08 +0200, Dan Pascu wrote: > Yes it does, but it is not a viable solution to have to constantly run > darcs optimize when you have too many files, from fearing that you may > exceed them and get an error. Not to mention the slowness a flattened > directory with that many files will introduce anyway.
I wonder if it would make sense for a future version of hashed pristine to store _darcs/pristine/long-hash-string _darcs/pristine/long-hash-string.dir _darcs/pristine/long-hash-string.dir/other-long-hash-string Ah but then we quickly run afoul of filepath length restrictions... Hmm then maybe storing the dirs as _darcs/pristine/0 _darcs/pristine/1 ... etc And storing the dirname in the inventory file for that directory might make sense -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
