Hello.

On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 8:27 PM, Eric Kow <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Dmitry,
>
> What do you think about reviewing this one?

I will be happy to do the review. But I am afraid I will not be able
to do it until this weekend.

Regards,
  Dmitry


>
> (I would sure appreciate it if I can get two other volunteers to
> cross-review this one)
>
> Thanks!
>
> On Tue, Dec 23, 2008 at 18:21:28 +0100, Petr Rockai wrote:
>> This brings me to another point: I nominate this patch for 2.2 on the grounds
>> of "meeting release goals". This means it needs fairly careful review and 
>> some
>> more testing than it has gotten -- I currently only tried it on darcs repo
>> itself (not corrupted) and it passes my new repair-corrupt (for which I'll 
>> have
>> to come up with a fix... I'll send that in a minute). I am "reasonably" sure 
>> it
>> does the right thing, which is of course not enough.
>>
>> Kowey, I delegate the task of picking the right reviewer(s) to you, hopefully
>> we'll be able to get this through in time
>
> --
> Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow>
> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
>
> iEYEARECAAYFAklRH5wACgkQBUrOwgisBPnoxACfWTWyMwTWVX7GcPHN48ZEZn8y
> LcEAmwazDGYk7kvbLEHAPkCrWyGX6LD7
> =USLN
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users

Reply via email to