On Sun, Dec 28, 2008 at 5:20 AM, Eric Kow <[email protected]> wrote: > I couldn't think of any particularly good reasons why it's good that > your particular case should fail (after all, you can cleanly merge two > mkdir A patches), but I suspect that there are cases where, like this > one, darcs does not do what people expect, but unlike this one, people > are expecting the "wrong" thing.
Well, it's hard to say I'm expecting the wrong thing, especially since the rename can very distant in the original repository's history. The inability to merge in an innocent looking change can be pretty mysterious to someone how doesn't remember all of the history of the repo. But if that's how it works, that's how it works. I use darcs becuse the patch-theory makes many other operations a lot more usable. -Antoine _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
