On Sun, Jan 18, 2009 at 01:19:26 +1100, Trent W. Buck wrote: > PS: I forgot to add FIXME: why do we use both print_version and > putStrLn darcs_version? They emit slightly different output, > which is why I didn't "fix" it in this refactor patch.
Well, when you type 'darcs --version', you know exactly what you want. When you just type 'darcs', you don't. Sounds like print_version is a bit of a misnomer. Something like printCommandSummary? -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
