Eric Kow <[email protected]> writes: > The Cabal file and Setup.lhs you have written us has an explicit > dependency on 1.6 and we were wondering if there was a particularly > strong reason to do this, and if it would be extremely inconvenient to > make it work with Cabal 1.2. > > (I now say 1.2 instead of 1.4, because it's what ships with GHC 6.8, > which is presumably what Trent is after...).
Right; brain fart. I want this because it will allow Darcs 2.3 to be "backported" to Lenny, which will be released with GHC 6.8 not 6.10. > I think we're OK with requiring Cabal 1.6. It's just that if we can > easily get away without it, we might as well try to minimise the pain > on our users. My sentiments exactly. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
