On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 16:19:59 -0800, Ben Coburn wrote: > See my followup to issue1177 ( http://bugs.darcs.net/msg7216 ). > > As expressed in the followup, this is a request to change darcs behavior > (semantics?) to do the right thing more of the time. I believe that it is > fully forward & backward compatible, and I do not see any reason to make > this change as an option.... However, other minds should study this to > make sure nothing important has been overlooked.
Thanks! Does Trent's test case match your expectations about how darcs should behave? If so, Trent, could you attach this to the issue tracker so we don't lose it? If so and if this is a change to darcs semantics (as opposed to a UI tweak), I recommend we hold off on this until we've had a chance to study it more deeply. Cheers, -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
