On Thu, 5 Feb 2009, Maurício wrote:
What if we had the option to attach such kind of
descriptions (can I call them "descriptions"?) to
files under darcs control? If there exists a
consolidated and popular such metasyntax (is
there?), darcs could use it to "understand" the
file, and remember changes in a structured way.
Even once you've dealt with the problem of a good bidirectional mapping
between text and trees, you have to work out what the patch commutation
rules are for the trees. I don't think that's a trivial problem, though
hopefully we can figure it out at some point.
Cheers,
Ganesh
_______________________________________________
darcs-users mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
