Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
That's simply not true in more generality than "in the case I just invented for the purpose of proving this point", though. In some similar cases a happy merger is just what you want.
Yes, but my point was that the VCS doesn't know. That said, if it is true that...
The verdict of the users was overwhelmingly in favor of happy-go-lucky merging of identical changes.
Then all I can say is ... :-(
There is a way out of this problem. And that's to focus on how Darcs makes sane programming easier by checking what can be checked and doing what can be done in typical cases, rather than focusing on a spurious notion of correctness in edge cases.
I was hoping that we would some example to justify the claim that the theory of patches is somehow better than 3-way merge.
Daniel. _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
