On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Jason Dagit <[email protected]> wrote: > Thanks Eric et al. > > On Wed, Apr 15, 2009 at 6:27 AM, Eric Kow <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> - Our wiki software is named *git*it even though it's using a darcs >> repository. This may be bad marketing, so we'll have to work out >> a gentle way to dealing with this, probably by reminding folks in >> the template to darcs get the repo > > My preference is to call it a "darcsit" wiki and clearly explain that > it is an official release of gitit that uses darcs instead of git. > >> - LICENSING: since we're thinking about it, how about adopting a >> formal license for all new content? The haskell.org wiki uses >> a "simple permissive license" which is the closest practical >> thing to public domain they could get: > > As long as it's compatible with the darcs source license (currently > GPL). We may want to package the two together at some point and > having them under the same license makes that just a bit more hassle > free. > > Jason
BSD-like licenses (which I believe the haskell.org license is) are compatible with GPL, yes. We can always license modifications of the former to the latter (just not the other way around). -- gwern _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
