[email protected] (Trent W. Buck) writes: > But the 2.2.1 release went out to Hackage only, and its tag is not in > the main repo. So this technique doesn't work for it. ISTR there's a > good reason why the 2.2.1 tag wasn't included in the main repo. Petr, > would you remind me what that reason is? The short story is, that the dual-release thing is a mess. And since there was no autotool-based 2.2.1, we can't have a tag either I guess, since it's still the preferred buildsystem, or something. Actually, I would prefer to not talk about it. The situation will be resolved eventually and tags will start to match releases again.
Yours Truly. PS: The tag can't be there also because the cabal version of mainline is still 2.2.0. I'll try to defuxxor that part of the story today, I guess. -- Peter Rockai | me()mornfall!net | prockai()redhat!com http://blog.mornfall.net | http://web.mornfall.net "In My Egotistical Opinion, most people's C programs should be indented six feet downward and covered with dirt." -- Blair P. Houghton on the subject of C program indentation _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
