On Wed, Jul 15, 2009 at 06:43:32PM +0100, Eric Kow wrote: > > action, we should be left with a GPL licensed logo, much > like the Mercurial folks: > http://www.selenic.com/pipermail/mercurial/2008-October/021875.html > And that might be OK too as a fall-back most-conservative license that > we could relax on a case-by-case basis...
IANAL, but I believe that you are confusing copyright licensing with trademark licensing. Thanks Ian _______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
