Sorry, should have changed that subject many lines in the thread ago. On Tue, Jul 28, 2009 at 10:50:26 +1000, Trent W. Buck wrote: > > Adding to Jason's question: is it OK to just apply the patch and > > hope that the distributions will have found a way out of this in 6 > > months?
The patch I was referring to was: Wed Jul 22 10:13:25 BST 2009 Petr Rockai <[email protected]> * Require haskell zlib, dropping the legacy internal zlib binding. ... which I was dithering about and have only just applied > The patch is already in HEAD, at least. As Joachim says on the Debian > list, if there's a legitimate bug in zlib 0.5.0 that Darcs should > avoid, it's better to break haskell-platform compatibility than allow > compilation with a buggy zlib. Thanks to Ganesh for keeping any confusion out of the thread. Cheers, -- Eric Kow <http://www.nltg.brighton.ac.uk/home/Eric.Kow> PGP Key ID: 08AC04F9
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ darcs-users mailing list [email protected] http://lists.osuosl.org/mailman/listinfo/darcs-users
